The best case scenario here is that LTS are being deliberately evasive; avoiding controversy by providing platitudes.
The alternative is more worrying.
Are we, for example, to interpret this statement as suggesting that LTS do not agree that a “one size fits all policy” applies to matters of scientific fact? The bones of the issue are that creationism is not science; not even when dressed up in the scientific language that’s employed deceptively by the Intelligent Design movement. Its lack of scientific credibility is a “one size fits all” fact, not a matter of opinion.