The Glasgow based Centre for Intelligent Design (C4ID) has replied without actually addressing the points made.
The title of their response says it all;
Intelligent Design is an explanation not an apologetic - a response to Ekklesia
How does "sometime, somehow, somewhere, for some reason, some things, were designed by something" explain anything? How can you test it?
It is only when the IDCreationists start to address these issues that they can even claim their position is even vaguely scientific.