Phil Bell from CMI will be touring Scotland from 1st to 6th March 2011.
See the Creation watch page for more details.
If anyone would like to be added to our mailing list for our periodic e-Bulletin please send your name and email address to email@example.com . We will respond with a confirmation email and, for the first 200 requests giving a postal address, we will post to you a free copy of the full-length DVD 'Unlocking the Mystery of Life'. We are now planning for 2011:Why not send for this? Better than it going to a creationist who might use it confuse more people! This material also speaks volumes about the origin of ID in the UK. It was first sent to every UK school and college by the group Truth in Science who we already know are a group of Young Earth Creationists. Yes they think people rode on dinosaurs. Yes we mean it.
A summer school from July 18-22, probably in rural England, at which Intelligent Design Theory and its implications will be explored in some detail. This event will be particularly suitable for undergraduates and postgraduates in any discipline, but will also have a wider appeal. We anticipate that the tutors will include leading advocates of Intelligent Design from the United Kingdom, Europe and North America. We shall be sending out further information shortly. If you are interested then send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org and we will keep you posted.
A two day conference in the Autumn in the UK to provide an update on progress and to consider current challenges. Updates request to email@example.comPlease get in touch at committee at bcseweb.org.uk
I teach Sunday school for first through third grade, and over the next few weeks we’ll be discussing dinosaurs, radiometric dating methods, natural selection, and mutations. I teach them that what they learn in public school in regard to historical science concerning these ideas is not the truth.
“If evolution is true, there is no purpose to life."
“Creationism will be embodied as a belief at Everyday Champions Academy, but will not be taught in the sciences,”
“Similarly, evolution will be taught as a theory. We believe children should have a broad knowledge of all theories in order that they can make informed choice.”
As Dave illustrates, any belief, no matter how ludicrous, can be made consistent with the available evidence, given a little patience and ingenuity. Believe that the earth is flat, that the moon is made of cheese, that the World Trade Center was brought down by the US government, or that George W. Bush is really Elvis Presley in disguise? All these theories can be endlessly adjusted and developed so that they remain consistent with the available evidence. Yet they are obviously not well confirmed. The claim that Young Earth Creationism is at least as well confirmed as its scientific rivals relies crucially on what we might call the “fit” model of confirmation. According to the “fit”model, confirmation is all about “fitting” the evidence. But more is required for genuine confirmation than mere “fit,” which any theory, no matter how absurd, can in principle achieve.
Young Earth Creationism has been, and continues to be, taught in schools. Often this is done covertly (I know of two British schools where Young Earth Creationism has been taught by a science teacher without the knowledge or permission of the school or other members of staff—and one was one of Britain’s leading independent schools). Obviously I object to Young Earth Creationism being taught in schools as a rival to orthodox scientific theories. People often object to the teaching of Young Earth Creationism on the grounds that children should not be taught ludicrous, obvious falsehoods. That’s not my main objection. My central criticism is this: teaching children that Young Earth Creationism is scientifically respectable involves teaching children to think like Dave. It involves getting them to think in ways that, under other circumstances, might justifiably lead us to suspect the thinker is suffering from some sort of mental illness. By allowing Young Earth Creationism into the classroom, we run not only the risk that children will end up believing ridiculous falsehoods, which is bad enough, but, worse still, that that they’ll end up supposing that the kind of warped and convoluted mental gymnastics in which Young Earth Creationists engage is actually cogent scientific thinking. We may end up corrupting not just what they think, but more importantly, how they think.
Now, given these vast opportunities now available to scientists interested in protein evolution, wouldn't you think that design theorists who write on the topic will be eager to get involved in such studies? I sure would, especially since the lab that did this work is within a short drive of the epicenter of intelligent design research, a research insitute headed by a scientist whose professional expertise and interest lies in the analysis of protein sequence-function relationships. As I've repeated throughout this series, there's something strange about a bunch of scientists who want to change the world but who can't be bothered to interact with the rest of the scientific community, a community that in this case is well-represented in active laboratories right down the road. (I'm eager to be proven wrong on this point, by learning that ID scientists have interacted with the Loeb lab or the Fields lab.)
More to the point, there's something tragically ironic about the fact that the ID movement is headquartered in Seattle, inveighing against "Darwinism" while obliviously amidst a world-class gathering of scientists who are busy tackling the very questions that ID claims to value.From the excellent Panda's Thumb
Answers in Genesis has weighed in on last week’s firing of John Freshwater, the Ohio middle-school science teacher who taught students in public school that homosexuality is a sin, evolution is a lie and science can’t be trusted and then burned a cross into a kid’s arm with a Tesla coil.But then you can't really expect judgement from ideologues can you?